Recruiting operations

Score a sourcing work sample with a written rubric

A remote recruiting operations guide for recruiting leaders and hiring teams, focused on sourcing work samples with explicit evidence, review rights, and a dated close.

Remote Talent Acquisition Editorial Team8 min read
Editorial recruiting workflow illustration for Score a sourcing work sample with a written rubric

Book a free recruiting call

Discuss a defined recruiting workflow, its owners, and its operating boundaries.

Plan a free call

# Score a sourcing work sample with a written rubric

Published November 6, 2026

The control this sourcing work samples needs

A sourcing work samples control begins with the requisition or candidate event that opened the case. The coordinator may assemble the source record, check the agreed evidence, and write the open question. The recruiting owner keeps every decision that changes a candidate, an offer, an interview commitment, or a hiring outcome. Remote Talent Acquisition places that boundary beside the sourcing work samples queue so a new coordinator does not borrow authority from an earlier search. Every closed candidate file carries a destination reference and a next check date.

The common gap in sourcing work samples is a record that looks current while the source evidence is absent. A pipeline can show movement even when the scorecard, the consent note, or the approval is missing. Record the source, the date observed, the candidate reference, and the next action before the case advances. That habit lets a reviewer rebuild the file without a private conversation. The calibration log records the decision, the date, and the next interview.

What the sourcing work samples record must show

Every sourcing work samples file should say who opened it, which source was checked, what changed, and who approved the close. Include the candidate reference, the role, the reviewer, the recruiting owner, and the destination. Keep the observed fact separate from the hiring interpretation. A reviewer should be able to follow that path in under a minute. Channel cost review compares the current fee with the hires attributed to that source.

The evidence standard for sourcing work samples is intentionally modest. Write the source date and mark a missing value as missing instead of filling it from memory. When two records disagree, preserve both and route the narrow question to the recruiting owner. Remote Talent Acquisition keeps the original source beside the correction note. The agency handoff names the fee terms, the role scope, and the first screen date.

Where authority stops

The coordinator may prepare, check, record, and route. The recruiting owner keeps any decision that changes an offer, a candidate commitment, access, or a hiring outcome. When a sourcing work samples case raises a privacy question, a bias concern, a dispute, or a request outside scope, preserve the facts and route it. A deliberate stop protects the candidate experience when the exception is real. Relocation approval records the amount, the approver, and the start-date condition.

Access to the sourcing work samples file follows a least-privilege rule. Each coordinator gets an individual account, and the permission set is limited to the written scope. The recruiting owner reviews that access when the assignment changes or the search ends. Remote Talent Acquisition records the review date with the sourcing work samples file. The recruiter keeps the role reference, the source, and the hiring manager owner with the note.

Exceptions that stop the case

Predictable sourcing work samples exceptions include a missing source, two records that disagree, an expired consent, an unavailable owner, an unsigned approval, or a request outside the agreed scope. Record the exception and the exact missing field so the next reviewer does not repeat the search. Use a short approved reason list so counts stay comparable. Keep the source, the date observed, the named owner, and the next check with the record. Candidate consent and communication preferences stay visible in the record.

If a sourcing work samples exception touches an offer, a candidate commitment, a privacy question, a bias concern, or a public hiring statement, the dependent action waits for the recruiting owner. Do not infer approval from silence or from a prior similar search. The resolution should say what was decided and where the evidence lives. Keep the source, the date observed, the named owner, and the next check with the record. Candidate consent and communication preferences stay visible in the record.

How to verify and close

To verify sourcing work samples, inspect the candidate record, the scorecard, the offer approval, the consent state, or the candidate-visible message. A sent email or a moved card proves activity, not that the record changed. Confirm the field or outcome the work was supposed to affect. If the destination cannot be checked, the case is not complete. The recruiter keeps the role reference, the source, and the hiring manager owner with the note.

The close note records what was checked, who approved it, what changed, and what would reopen the case. The recruiting owner should be able to read one record later and explain the close without contacting the original coordinator. Remote Talent Acquisition keeps the sourcing work samples close note with the source evidence. Keep the source, the date observed, the named owner, and the next check with the record. The calibration log records the decision, the date, and the next interview.

Review a bounded support plan

Discuss a defined recruiting workflow, its owners, and its operating boundaries.

Plan a free call

Continue reading

Three related guides

Plan the next recruiting workflow

Discuss a defined recruiting workflow, its owners, and its operating boundaries.

Plan a free call